Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Johan Nikles vs Maks Tekavec Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nikles vs Tekavec analysis and find out who is favored!
Johan Nikles vs Maks Tekavec Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nikles 1 - 0 Tekavec
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nikles has won 46.29% of points on their second serve, while Tekavec has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nikles, in recent form, has won 53.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tekavec has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.44% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nikles has saved 60.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tekavec has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nikles has won 62.16% of matches played (W/L 23/ 14), with Tekavec winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nikles has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 70/ 46), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Tekavec has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 78% (W/L 7/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Nikles has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.74% of matches (W/L 21/ 10), where as Tekavec has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nikles winning 1 times and Tekavec being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nikles winning 2 and Tekavec winning 0. The last match between Nikles and Tekavec was at the Greece F10, 02-11-2015, Quarterfinals, Hard with Johan Nikles getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nikles and Tekavec have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nikles winning 0 times and Tekavec 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nikles winning 0, and Tekavec 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nikles has played against opponents with an average rank of 114.65 while Tekavec has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nikles has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tekavec has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nikles has converted 47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tekavec has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
868
Rank
256
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
58% (265-194)
Career Total W/L
65% (13-7)
62% (23-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$11,650
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Johan Nikles vs Maks Tekavec For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Nikles VS Tekavec
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Johan Nikles | Maks Tekavec |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:0:0 | 1:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (34/52) | 60% (25/42) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (25/34) | 76% (19/25) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 72% (13/18) | 29% (5/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (18/42) | 27% (14/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Johan Nikles
Player
Maks Tekavec
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Johan Nikles | Maks Tekavec |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (23/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (52/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (423/336) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 65% (20/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 8 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 60 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:1 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 114.65 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1269/1848) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (767/1269) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (268/579) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (94/200) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (806/1816) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 68% (21/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (22/36) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 36% (4/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (28/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (28/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Johan Nikles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Johan Nikles
61%
(
77 of
127)
1st Serve %
71%
(
90 of
127)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
53 of
90)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
53 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
55 of
127)
129
Total Points Won
125
|
6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Johan Nikles
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Mario Martinez Serrano
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Johan Nikles
60%
(
71 of
119)
1st Serve %
75%
(
79 of
106)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
53 of
79)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
39 of
106)
110
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Luka Pavlovic
64%
(
78 of
122)
1st Serve %
47%
(
51 of
108)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
9
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
36%
(
44 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
112
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Johan Nikles
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Johan Nikles
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
108
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Seita Watanabe
86%
(
73 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
71 of
95)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Matteo Fondriest
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Maks Tekavec Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Maks Tekavec
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Maks Tekavec
Player
Loic Juszczak
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
3
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
7
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
55 of
105)
110
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maks Tekavec
Player
Ioannis Stergiou
69%
(
97 of
140)
1st Serve %
88%
(
76 of
86)
16
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
0
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
52 of
76)
35%
(
15 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
44%
(
61 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
26 of
86)
105
Total Points Won
121
|
1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Nikles Vs Tekavec Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Nikles are available here and Tekavec photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Johan Nikles
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
